Bsf Febbraio 2004

bsf@circolab.net

69 partecipanti
140 conversazioni

Inizia una nNuova conversazione

by epelosi＠rotheerde.it 17 Feb '04

17 Feb '04

Per favore inviare a Volpe Patrizia

1 0

Manifestazione 21 febbraio
by Brescia Social Forum 17 Feb '04

17 Feb '04

CONTINUIAMO LA LOTTA DOPO LA MANIFESTAZIONE DEL 8 NOVEMBRE LA PREFETTURA E LA QUESTURA DI BRESCIA HANNO INIZIATO A DARE I PERMESSI DI SOGGIORNO AD IMMIGRATI CHE AVEVANO I DOCUMENTI BLOCCATI . MA NON BASTA !!! DOBBIAMO PROTESTARE FINO A CHE SIAMO SICURI CHE ANCHE LULTIMO FRATELLO E L'ULTIMA SORELLA ABBIANO PRESO IL SUO PERMESSO DI SOGGIORNO. DOBBIAMO LOTTARE PER: IL PERMESSO DI SOGGIORNO PER TUTTI LA CASA E IL DIRITTO DI VOTO PER TUTTI SABATO 21 FEBBRAIO MANIFESTAZIONE ORE 14.30 PIAZZA LOGGIA IMMIGRATI IN LOTTA FAI COORD. IMMIGRATI CGIL IMMIGRATI FRANCIACORTA E VALLE TROMPIA ASSOCIA. PAKISTAN WELFARE CLUB ASSOCI. MUHAMMADIAH COMUNITA SENEGALESE PREALPINO CENTRO ISLAMICO DI BRESCIA MAGAZZINO 47 BRESCIA SOCIAL FORUM ASSOC.PENISOLA

2 1

proposta di appello per dibattito
by Carlo Di Giovambattista 17 Feb '04

17 Feb '04

propongo un'appello per un dibattito sulle elezioni prossime venture e sui contenuti da sviluppare in quella campagna elettorale. la proposta è modificabile e sottoscrivibile. "Stiamo attraversando una fase di forte separazione tra istanze dei movimenti sociali e rappresentanza politica di opposizione al governo. L'opposizione del centrosinistra all'ultraliberismo del governo è sempre più centrata sulla critica del personale politico dei gruppi di potere aggregati intorno a Berlusconi. Pensiamo che sia invece fondamentale sviluppare un'opposizione nel merito delle politiche liberiste, e avanzare una proposta politica che rompa con le compatibilità-interessi nazionali e multinazionali del capitale, che metta al centro i bisogni della grande maggioranza degli esseri umani. Per questo di fronte alle prossime scadenze elettorali (europee ed amministrative) pensiamo sia necessario iniziare un dibattito, a Brescia, sui contenuti della campagna elettorale per battere la destra. Per questo proponiamo un'assemblea pubblica di tutti i movimenti-soggetti sociali e politici antiliberisti da tenersi a brescia a fine marzo 2004." sauro

1 0

Re: Past Due Payment, account
by Meaghan Barbu 16 Feb '04

16 Feb '04

1 0

[Bsf] --> PDIs, Autorização de Cursos, Reconhecimento, Treinamentos, etc <--
by SAPIENS - MEC 15 Feb '04

15 Feb '04

1 0

FW: ExPa - materiali per il 16 febbraio
by Mimmo Cortese 14 Feb '04

14 Feb '04

ecco gli allegati Bye M

1 0

ExPa - materiali per il 16 febbraio
by Mimmo Cortese 14 Feb '04

14 Feb '04

Crissimi/e, vi invio un po' di materiale per l'incontro di lunedì sera. In primo luogo una bozza di possibile manifesto per lanciare l'iniziativa ExPa. Naturalmente aperto a tutte le integrazioni/correzioni/cancellazioni, insomma alla discussione aperta. Vi invio poi un documento che illustra la proposta di Carovane Arcobaleno che ha preso le mosse nei giorni scorsi. Un' inzitiva molto importante nata dall'alveo del comitato "Fermiamo la Guerra", quel raggruppamento di associazioni che diede vita alla grande manifestazione del 15 febbraio dell'anno scorso. Spero, per chiudere, che lunedì possano avviarsi anche i gruppi di lavoro per procedere tranquillamente verso quest'importante meta. ciao e grazie Mimmo Cortese

1 0

[Bsf] Fw: RMSF - appello- la tua firma per i Diritti Sociali, Economici e Culturali - con preghiera di inoltro
by tonizingaro 14 Feb '04

14 Feb '04

----- Original Message ----- From: "tonizingaro" <gorangero(a)tele2.it> To: <romamigrantforum(a)yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 6:56 PM Subject: Re: RMSF - appello- la tua firma per i Diritti Sociali, Economici e Culturali - con preghiera di inoltro > Antun Blazevic > via delle Ceramiche 9 > 00167 Roma > Associazione Culturale Rom > DROMOMANIA > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <manberg(a)tin.it> > To: <romamigrantforum(a)yahoogroups.com>; <didaweb(a)yahoogroups.com>; > <grosofo(a)yahoogroups.com> > Cc: <info(a)dirittisociali.org> > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 7:19 PM > Subject: RMSF - appello- la tua firma per i Diritti Sociali, Economici e > Culturali - con preghiera di inoltro > > > Cari amici, > > Ecco in inglese una dichiarazione scritta da una coalizione internazionale > per ottenere un Protocollo Opzionale al Patto Internazionale per i Diritti > Economici, Sociali e Culturali. > > La cosa é seria per tutti quelli che tra noi credono che questi Diritti > non siano abbastanza rispettati. se volete aderire, basta inoltrare questa > mail a berry(a)icj.org specificando il vostro: > > -nome > -associazione > -indirizzo > > Se volete, potete inoltrare la risposta anche al mio indirizzo > (manberg(a)tin.it > ) che vi terrò informati in italiano sugli sviluppi di questa campagna > Internazionale > di vitale importanza, e su tutte le approcciabili scadenze. > > Naturalmente servono energie e risorse di cui non disponiamo a sufficienza, > ed ogni vostro slancio potrebbe essere quello che ci servirà per produrre > eventi, dati, contatti, pressioni sul nostro governo e sulle istituzioni > internazionali, e per seguire la trattativa in corso alle Nazioni Unite. > > buon lavoro, > > Manfred Bergmann > > Casa dei Diritti Sociali (House of Social Rights), membro del Comitato > Italiano > per la Promozione e Protezione dei Diritti Umani > > Via dei Mille 6 > Roma 00185 > Italy > tel . (0039) 064464613 - cell 3474735067 > manberg(a)tin.it > www.dirittisociali.org > www.december18.net > Joint Sign-On Statement > > Send endorsements to berry(a)icj.org > > > > JOINT SUBMISSION BY NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS, HUMAN RIGHTS > INSTITUTIONS > AND CIVIL SOCIETY GROUPS PERTAINING TO THE DELIBERATIONS OF THE COMMISSION > ON HUMAN RIGHTS, INTER-SESSIONAL WORKING GROUP ESTABLISHED TO CONSIDER > OPTIONS > REGARDING THE ELABORATION OF AN OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE INTERNATIONAL > COVENANT > ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS > > > February 2004 > > > > > > I. INTRODUCTION > > > > > > The fifty-ninth session of the Commission on Human Rights established an > inter-sessional open-ended working group mandated to consider options > regarding > the elaboration of an Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on > Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, (hereinafter ICESCR or the Covenant). > Motivated by a widespread concern for the protection and promotion of > economic, > social and cultural rights, the undersigned, in representation of > non-governmental > organisations, human rights institutions and civil society, submit the > following > views concerning the deliberations of the working group that will meet for > its inaugural session in February 2004. > > > > > > II. CONTEXT > > > > > > Guided by principles enshrined in the United Nations Universal Declaration > of Human Rights, it is clear that undivided State party adherence to the > Covenant is of considerable importance in protecting and promoting economic, > social and cultural rights. It is recognised that, through their > ratification > of the Covenant, States parties bear responsibility to ensure that economic, > social and cultural rights are protected and promoted. The ensuing need > to assist in the realisation of these rights, through the provision of a > comprehensive international remedial mechanism to intervene during and/or > adjudicate over ICESCR rights violations, is thus of paramount importance. > > > > > > III. MINIMUM CORE CONTENT OF AN OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE ICESCR > > > > > > The undersigned non-governmental organisations, human rights institutions > and civil society representatives assert that the following minimum core > elements are essential for an Optional Protocol to the ICESCR to fulfil > its potential as an effective mechanism through which economic, social and > cultural rights may be protected and promoted: > > > > (a) Comprehensive Scope > > > > Gathering together representatives from over 170 States, the 1993 Vienna > World Conference on Human Rights was unequivocal in confirming the > universality, > interdependence, indivisibility and interrelatedness of civil, cultural, > economic, political and social rights. Given that the first Optional > Protocol > to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, (hereinafter > ICCPR), relates in a comprehensive manner to all of the rights embodied > in that Covenant, not to adopt a similar approach in drafting an Optional > Protocol to the ICESCR would be to directly challenge the universality, > interdependence, indivisibility and interrelatedness of all human rights.[1] > For this reason, an Optional Protocol to the ICESCR should clearly address > all of the rights and State obligations enshrined in the Covenant. > > > > (b) State Obligations to Respect, Protect and Fulfil Covenant Rights > > > > As with the first Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, an Optional Protocol to > the ICESCR should address both negative and positive State obligations > associated > with the realisation of Covenant rights. In particular, an Optional > Protocol > to the ICESCR should entertain complaints and empower an inquiry procedure > where States parties violate their obligations to respect, protect and > fulfil-facilitate/fulfil-provide > Covenant rights. > > > > The obligation to respect requires States parties to refrain from > interfering > with the enjoyment of Covenant enshrined economic, social and cultural > rights. > This is a negative obligation that mandates States parties to act in a > way that does not violate economic, social and cultural rights and/or > infringe > on an individual?s freedom to access these rights. Within this context, > States parties must ?respect the freedom of the individuals to take the > necessary actions and use the necessary resources ? alone or in association > with others.?[2] > > > > The obligation to protect requires States parties to prevent ICESCR rights > abuses by third parties. In this, States parties must take ?measures > necessary > to prevent other individuals or groups from violating the integrity, freedom > of action, or other human rights of the individual ? including the > infringement > of his material resources.?[3] > > The obligation to fulfil encompasses State party obligations to facilitate > access to and/or provide for the full realisation of economic, social and > cultural rights. This is a positive obligation. The obligation to > facilitate > requires States parties to pro-actively engage in activities that strengthen > access to and the utilisation of resources and means to ensure the > realisation > of Covenant rights. The obligation to provide requires States to take > measures necessary to ensure that each person within its jurisdiction may > obtain basic economic, social and cultural rights satisfaction whenever > they, for reasons beyond their control, are unable to realise these rights > through the means at their disposal.[4] > > > > State obligations under the Optional Protocol to the ICESCR must encompass > both negative and positive obligations, thereby reinforcing the universality > interrelatedness and indivisibility of all human rights. Such an approach > would also serve as a reminder to the international community, through the > ICESCR/Optional Protocol working group, of the importance it attaches to > economic, social and cultural rights issues and seriousness with which it > now responds to violations. > > > > (c) An Optional Protocol Complaint's and Inquiry Procedure > > > > Conceptualised as a complaint's mechanism and an inquiry procedure, an > Optional > Protocol to the ICESCR would possess the potential to significantly > contribute > towards the realisation of Covenant enshrined economic, social and cultural > rights. > > > > An Optional Protocol complaint's mechanism would provide individuals and > groups with access to an international adjudicative procedure. Under this > procedure, individuals and/or groups could communicate directly with the > United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, (?the > Committee?), to seek and obtain remedies for specific violations of rights > contained in the Covenant. > > > > An Optional Protocol?s inquiry procedure would empower the Committee to > initiate an investigation into particularly grave or systematic abuses of > Covenant rights. An inquiry procedure would reinforce an Optional > Protocol?s > complaints procedure as it would: (i) Open an avenue to address situations > where individual/group communications could not adequately reflect the > gravity > or the systemic nature of violations of Covenant provisions; (ii) Allow > grave and/or systematic Covenant violations to be investigated where > individuals > or groups were unable to utilise the complaint's mechanism for reasons > including > fear of reprisals; and (iii) Enable a more-timely response to grave and/or > systematic violations of the provisions of the Covenant, and to continuing > violations in particular.[5] > > > > (d) Standing to Lodge an Optional Protocol Complaint > > > > At a minimum, parties who possess the ability to initiate a complaint, > (standing), > under an Optional Protocol to the ICESCR, should include: > > > > (i) Individuals and group of individuals[6] who have been victims > of violations of Covenant rights by State parties; > > > > (ii) Representatives of individuals or groups of individuals > empowered to initiate complaints on behalf of individual and collective > victims. > > > > The importance of expressly acknowledging the competence of representatives, > particularly non-governmental organizations and national human rights > institutions > to launch complaints on behalf of individual and groups victims of ICESCR > violations cannot be underestimated. Under existing instruments, complaints > on behalf of individual and group victims have either been specifically > included[7] or such representative standing has been provided through > adjudicative > interpretation.[8] The significance of allocating standing to such > representatives > is rooted in the fact that these types of communications play an essential > role in initiating international complaint's procedures, particularly where > victims face the risk of ill-treatment or other retaliation for directly > engaging in the process.[9] > > > > > > (e) State Party Reservations Under an Optional Protocol > > > > Precluding reservations to the Optional Protocol[10] to the ICESCR would > represent a significant commitment by States parties which ratify the > Protocol, > to uphold the integrity of internationally recognised economic, social and > cultural rights. Excluding the use of reservations would be appropriate > as: > > > > (i) The raison d?etre of an Optional Protocol would be to assist > people in realising their economic, social and cultural rights as enshrined > in the ICESCR. As a tool to both complement and strengthen the Covenant, > to allow State party reservations to an Optional Protocol would be to > undermine > its potential as a tool for the full realisation of economic, social and > cultural rights; > > > > (ii) An Optional Protocol would by its very nature be optional and > as such, reservations that curtailed its applicability would be unnecessary; > > > > (iii) An Optional Protocol would be a procedural instrument as it > would neither introduce new nor expand present economic, social and cultural > rights obligations that States parties accepted through their ratification > of the Covenant. An Optional Protocol would thus merely serve as a means > through which States parties would be encouraged to realise existing ICESCR > obligations. > > > > (iv) An effective Optional Protocol must recognise the indivisible > and interdependent relationship amongst all Covenant rights. To allow > States > parties to individually select the ICESCR rights subject to an Optional > Protocol strike at the core this relationship and the instruments ability > to protect and promote Covenant rights. Such a selective approach would > open the door to arguments as to the hierarchy of and inequality between > economic, social and cultural rights, thereby encroaching upon the > universality, > interdependence, indivisibility and interrelatedness of all human > rights.[11] > Further, permitting the selection of economic, social and cultural rights > subject to the Optional Protocol mechanisms would risk that some States > parties would enhance their international prestige, through ratification, > while restricting the instrument?s substantive application; > > > > (v) State party concerns that might prompt reservations with regard > to specific aspects of an Optional Protocol procedure could be accommodated > through the provisions of the instrument itself. > > > > IV. THE DRAFTING OF AN OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE ICESCR: AVAILABLE > RESOURCES > > > > In considering options regarding the elaboration of an Optional Protocol > to the ICESCR, the undersigned urge the open-ended working group to > recommend > the drafting of an Optional Protocol text to the 60th session of the > Commission > on Human Rights as conceptual issues related to this procedure have received > a thorough analysis from a wide variety of sources that include: > > > > (i) The abundant experience and jurisprudence of national, regional > and international bodies/instruments that employ adjudicative/inquiry > procedures > related to violations of economic, social and cultural rights. Reference > may be made to the United Nations Human Rights Committee, the European Court > of Human Rights, the European Committee on Social Rights, the African > Charter > on Human and Peoples' Rights, the San Salvador Protocol, (Inter-American > Commission jurisprudence and country reports), the Optional Protocol to > the Covenant on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, the United > Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Complaint's > Procedure, > the International Labour Organisation Committee on the Freedom of > Association > and an abundance of national jurisprudence; > > > > (ii) A plethora of national and international and civil society > conferences > and instruments that have clarified the nature and scope of economic, social > and cultural rights and States parties obligations under the ICESCR. > Amongst > these, the Declaration of Delhi (1959), the Law of Lagos (1961), the Limburg > Principles on the Implementation of the ICESCR (1986), the World Conference > on Human Rights (1993), the World Summit for Social Development (1995), > the Bangalore Plan of Action (1995), the Maastricht Guidelines on the > Violation > of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1996) and United > Nations/International > Commission of Jurists' conferences on the Optional Protocol and economic, > social and cultural rights, (1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003), amongst > numerous > others, may be instructive; > > > > (iii) General Comments from the Committee that have clarified the > nature and scope of States parties Covenant obligations and ICESCR rights > including: international technical assistance measures; the nature of States > parties obligations under article 2; the right to adequate housing; the > economic, social and cultural rights of persons with disabilities and of > older persons; the right to adequate housing, (forced evictions); the > relationship > between economic sanctions and respect for economic, social and cultural > rights; the domestic application of the Covenant; the role of national human > rights institutions in the protection of economic, social and cultural > rights; > plans of action for primary education; the right to adequate food; the right > to education; the right to the highest attainable standard of health; and > the right to water; > > > > (iv) Committee discussions, summary records, studies and reports > that have provided further clarification concerning the nature and scope > of economic, social and cultural rights as they relate to an Optional > Protocol > to the ICESCR and in particular its work on a draft Optional Protocol and > related issues, (E/C.12/1996/SR.44-49 and 54), (E/C.12/1996/CRP.2/Add.1), > (E/C.12/1994/12), (E/CN.4/1997/105), (E/1993/22), and (E/C.12/1992/WP.9), > > > > (v) The draft Optional Protocol to the ICESCR prepared by the > Committee > for consideration by the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, > (E/CN.4/1997/105); > and > > > > (vi) Other sources that have further clarified conceptual issues > related > to an Optional Protocol to the ICESCR including: the experience of numerous > United Nations Special Rapporteurs engaged in various aspects of economic, > social and cultural rights;[12] the experience of the United Nations working > group under which the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination > of all Forms of Discrimination against Women was created; two reports from > the independent expert appointed by the Commission on Human Rights, > (resolution > 2001/30), to examine the question of a draft Optional Protocol to the > ICESCR; > and the vast amount of doctrine concerning an Optional Protocol and > economic, > social and cultural rights issues.[13] > > > > Given that conceptual issues related to an Optional Protocol to the ICESCR > have received a thorough analysis from a wide variety of sources, the > open-ended > working group should utilise the above listed wealth of resources as a > primary > basis point from which the text of an Optional Protocol to the ICESCR may > be drafted. > > > > (V) THE DRAFTING OF AN OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE ICESCR: TIMING > CONSIDERATIONS > > In conducting its deliberations, the ICESCR/Optional Protocol working group > should bear in mind the Commission on Human Rights decision of 26 April > 2000, (E/CN.4/2000/112), which endorsed that working group, > > > > (m)andates should always offer a clear prospect of an increased level of > human rights protection and promotion, (and that), (i)n creating any > standard-setting > working group, the Commission should consider a specific time-frame within > which the group would be called upon to complete its task. ...(i)n most > instances, the established time-frame should not in principle exceed five > years. > > > > Learning from the experiences of other processes that have led to the > establishment > of other Optional Protocols, the ICESCR/Optional Protocol working group > should adopt a pragmatic yet determined approach towards the completion > of its mandate. > > > > > the Undersigned > Manfred Bergmann > > on behalf of : > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > [1] Arambulo, K., Strengthening the Supervision of the International > Covenant > on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Theoretical and Procedural Aspects, > Intersentia, Antwerpen: 1999 at 235. See also van Hoof, F., "Discussion > on the Draft Optional Protocols" in van Hoof, F. and Coomans, F., eds., > The Right to Complain About Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, > Netherlands > Institute of Human Rights, Utrecht: 1995 at 212. See also See United > Nations > reference document E/C.12/1992/WP.9, paragraph 37. Following a > comprehensive > approach in drafting an Optional Protocol to the ICESCR would not preclude > the institution of procedural safeguards that would ensure that the > instrument > is not abused. By way of example, while a comprehensive approach was > utilised > in drafting the first Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, in interpreting > Article > 1 of this Covenant, the United Nations Human Rights Committee instituted > procedural safeguards so as to prevent the right to self-determination from > being the subject of communications. See Ominayak v. Canada, > Communication > No. 167/1984, Official Records of the General Assembly, forty-fifth > session, > Supplement No. 40 (A/45/40), vol. II, annex IX, section A at 1-30. > > [2] Asbjørn Eide, "Realisation of Social and Economic Rights. The Minimum > Threshold Approach", International Commission of Jurists The Review 1989, > Issue 43, 40, 1989, p. 43. See also Maastricht Guidelines on Violations > of Economic Social and Cultural Rights, January 1997, para. 6. > > [3] Ibid., (Eide) at 42. > > [4] The Maastricht Guidelines on Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural > Rights, para. 6. See also Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural > Rights, > General Comment 12, United Nations document reference, E/C.12/1999/5, para. > 15. > > [5] Inter-American Institute of Human Rights, Optional Protocol, Convention > on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women, Costa Rica: > 2000 at 71-72. An Optional Protocol to the ICESCR inquiry procedure could > be modelled after either Article 20 of the Convention Against Torture and > Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment or Article 8 of > the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms > of Discrimination against Women, both of which authorise inquiry procedures > in prescribed situations. > > [6] Nowak, M., "The Need for an Optional Protocol to the International > Covenant > on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights" in International Commission of > Jurists, The Review: Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Role of > Lawyers, France: 1995 at 160. Limiting standing/ability to initiate > complaints > under an Optional Protocol to the ICESCR to individuals would be to prevent > to deprive all groups and legal entities including trade unions, educative > associations, social groups and cultural minorities from the benefits > associated > with this instrument. > > [7] Providing standing to individuals and organisations to initiate > complaints > on behalf of individual and group victims of State party ICESCR rights > violations > follows the precedents of Article 2 of the Optional Protocol to the > Convention > on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women which states > ?Where a communication is submitted on behalf of individuals or groups of > individuals, this shall be with their consent unless the author can justify > acting on their behalf without such consent?, Article 22 of the Convention > Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or > Punishment > and Article 77 of the International Convention on the Protection of the > Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families. > > [8] Supra (Arambulo), note 1 at 223, 233-4. Through the practice of the > United Nations Human Rights Committee, communications submitted on behalf > of victims of State party ICCPR violations have been accepted. > > [9] Supra note 3 at 43. See also supra note 4 at 161. > > [10] Article 17 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the > Elimination > of all Forms of Discrimination against Women explicitly states ?No > reservations > to this Protocol may be permitted? > > [11] The United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women Department > of Economic and Social Affairs, The Convention on the Elimination of All > Forms of Discrimination Against Women, The Optional Protocol: Text and > Materials, > United Nations: 2000, at 49-50. See also supra, note 3 at 98-99. See > also supra note 1 at 236. > > [12] For example, housing, education, food and development. > > [13] See the work of P. Alston, K. Arambulo, M. Craven, A. Eide, D. > Harris, P. Hunt, S. Liebenberg, B. Porter, E. Riedel, M. Scheinin > and F. van Hoof, to name but a few. > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------ISTRUZIONI PER L'USO DELLA MAILING > LIST DEL > Roman Migrant Social Forum (RMSF, 170 tra associazioni e individui iscritti > al 19/agosto/2003) > > -iscriviti a questa Mailing List con una lettera in bianco a / To subscribe > this group, send a blank email to: > romamigrantforum-subscribe(a)yahoogroups.com > > -per sottrarsi da questa lista spedisci una lettera in bianco a / To > unsubscribe from this group, send a blank email to: > romamigrantforum-unsubscribe(a)yahoogroups.com > > per consultare i messaggi e la documentazione legale e statistica archiviata > sviluppa il tuo yahoo!profile ed esplora il sito della mailing list del > Roman Migrant Social Forum http://groups.yahoo.com/group/romamigrantforum > ------------ > --- --- --- --- --- > sostieni anche tu la Giornata Internazionale dei Lavoratori Migranti ! > www.december18.net > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------ISTRUZIONI PER L'USO DELLA MAILING LIST DEL > Roman Migrant Social Forum (RMSF, 170 tra associazioni e individui iscritti al 19/agosto/2003) > > -iscriviti a questa Mailing List con una lettera in bianco a / To subscribe this group, send a blank email to: > romamigrantforum-subscribe(a)yahoogroups.com > > -per sottrarsi da questa lista spedisci una lettera in bianco a / To unsubscribe from this group, send a blank email to: romamigrantforum-unsubscribe(a)yahoogroups.com > > per consultare i messaggi e la documentazione legale e statistica archiviata sviluppa il tuo yahoo!profile ed esplora il sito della mailing list del Roman Migrant Social Forum http://groups.yahoo.com/group/romamigrantforum > ------------ > --- --- --- --- --- > sostieni anche tu la Giornata Internazionale dei Lavoratori Migranti ! > www.december18.net > Yahoo! Groups Links > > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/romamigrantforum/ > > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > romamigrantforum-unsubscribe(a)yahoogroups.com > > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >

1 0

Lowest price of mp3 player, digital camera, cd/vcd/mp3 player, USB flash drive and PC camera!
by HY Tech 14 Feb '04

14 Feb '04

My dear friends, We can supply mp3 player, cd/vcd/mp3 player, digital camera and USB flash drive with new style and good price. We, HY Technology Limited is a professional company developing and producing new electronic products, including MP3 Player, CD/VCD/MP3 player, digital camera and PC camera, USB flash drive. Please see the price list of our products: MP3 player About 50USD/128M About 77USD/256M We have many kinds of mp3 player with latest fashion, such as the world's smallest player, supporting 8 languages, with FM radio function, etc. Digital camera (with status LCD) 15USD/300K pixels 26USD/1300K pixels (negotiable with the amount) 35USD/2.1M pixels 65USD/3M pixels 65USD PC camera 11USD/350K pixels 7USD/100K pixels USB flash drive with original Samsung flash 64M 21.5USD 128M 35.5USD 256M 61.5USD CD/VCD/MP3 player (3 play function in 1) including remote control and blue back light 22 USD (Negotiable with the amount). All the players can come with car adapter and cassette adapter!! If you need them, just add USD1.25. We have our own factory located in Shenzhen, China. Thus, our strong R & D team can work out the products to satisfy your need. If you need more information, please mail to us and we will send detailed catalogue, price list, our website and other information to you. Sincerely hope to establish a prosperous business relationship with you in future. Hattie Yuan Sales Specialist HY Technology (HK) Limited If this email has disturbed you, please just delete it. Thank you!

1 0

Lowest price of mp3 player, digital camera, cd/vcd/mp3 player, USB flash drive and PC camera!
by HY Tech 14 Feb '04

14 Feb '04

1 0

Salta alla pagina: